Product Journal
Daily notes on building and improving djamespoer.com. Open the Buildometer project instruments.
The original automated Scrum Brief archive was replaced after review showed that reusable project-status metadata had been interpreted as day-by-day project activity. The corrected archive was reconstructed from dated project evidence so each entry reflects what was actually happening in its reporting period.
Executive Scrum Brief —
Validated / learned
A fresh career-source inventory exposed a material distinction between stored assertions and owner-reviewed canonical claims. The newly documented registry reports that earlier aggregate “canonical facts” counts did not accurately describe review status. This changes the evidence-maintenance task: verify active records, dispositions and supersessions before propagating claims into generated career material. The registry is a read-only finding, not proof that the underlying records have been corrected.
The November 10 editorial publication failed because no same-day authored Jira payload was available. All 13 publication-adapter checks passed, and the publisher stopped before replacing valid history or inventing content. This late narrative recovers the missing handoff; it does not establish why the morning authoring run failed to produce it.
Current focus
The career-evidence focus is reconciling the authoritative store’s review states and active versions with prior maintenance reports. An identified discrepancy in an enterprise-modernization claim needs verification against the owner’s established project scope before downstream use. Public résumé release evidence does not by itself establish equivalent canonical review or external synchronization.
The inspected repository shows no additional product implementation after the persistent Shady White Van exhibit correction. The broader homepage remains subject to owner visual and editorial review, and the child-anchor resize follow-up remains unverified as a public fix.
Next
Resolve the source registry’s active-claim and review-status discrepancies through a bounded, evidence-preserving correction, then verify downstream consumers against the persisted records. Continue homepage review and the exhibit resize follow-up without treating the earlier rejected redesign as accepted. Recover today’s editorial delivery through the existing publisher and inspect the authoring execution record separately from publication mechanics.